The interplay of climate and land use change affects the distribution of EU bumblebees
Marshall, Leon; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.; Rasmont, Pierre; Vereecken, Nicolas J.; Dvorak, Libor; Fitzpatrick, Úna; Francis, Frédéric; Neumayer, Johann; Ødegaard, Frode; Paukkunen, Juho P.T.; Pawlikowski, Tadeusz; Reemer, Menno; Roberts, Stuart P.M.; Straka, Jakub; Vray, Sarah; Dendoncker, Nicolas
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
Åpne
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2493562Utgivelsesdato
2017Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NINA [2411]
- Scientific publications [1437]
Originalversjon
10.1111/gcb.13867Sammendrag
biodiversity loss, dynamic, future, land use change scenarios, pollinators, projections, species distribution models (SDMs), wild bees Bumblebees in Europe have been in steady decline since the 1900s. This decline is
expected to continue with climate change as the main driver. However, at the local
scale, land use and land cover (LULC) change strongly affects the occurrence of
bumblebees. At present, LULC change is rarely included in models of future distribu-
tions of species. This study
’
s objective is to compare the roles of dynamic LULC
change and climate change on the projected distribution patterns of 48 European
bumblebee species for three change scenarios until 2100 at the scales of Europe,
and Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg (BENELUX). We compared three types
of models: (1) only climate covariates, (2) climate and static LULC covariates and (3)
climate and dynamic LULC covariates. The climate and LULC change scenarios used
in the models include, extreme growth applied strategy (GRAS), business as might
be usual and sustainable European development goals. We analysed model
performance, range gain/loss and the shift in range limits for all bumblebees. Over-
all, model performance improved with the introduction of LULC covariates. Dynamic
models projected less range loss and gain than climate-only projections, and greater
range loss and gain than static models. Overall, there is considerable variation in
species responses and effects were most pronounced at the BENELUX scale. The
majority of species were predicted to lose considerable range, particularly under the
extreme growth scenario (GRAS; overall mean: 64%
34). Model simulations pro-
ject a number of local extinctions and considerable range loss at the BENELUX scale
(overall mean: 56%
39). Therefore, we recommend species-specific modelling to
understand how LULC and climate interact in future modelling. The efficacy of
dynamic LULC change should improve with higher thematic and spatial resolution.
Nevertheless, current broad scale representations of change in major land use
classes impact modelled future distribution patterns.