Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Cuyper, Annelies
dc.contributor.authorStrubbe, Diederik
dc.contributor.authorClauss, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorLens, Luc
dc.contributor.authorZedrosser, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSteyaert, Sam
dc.contributor.authorKopatz, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, Geert P.J.
dc.coverage.spatialEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T10:02:56Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T10:02:56Z
dc.date.created2024-06-26T09:07:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0909-6396
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3147094
dc.description.abstractGeneralist populations often harbor individual dietary specialists. Whether using a narrower set of resources than the population (= specialization) affects specialists' nutrient intake remains underexplored. We evaluated variation in ingredient and nutrient specialization in a European brown bear Ursus arctos population via the Proportional Similarity Index (PSi, from 0=highly specialized to 1=not specialized) and assessed associations of specialization with year, season and reproductive class. Different methodologies concerning the organization of raw data for PSi calculations were evaluated (i.e. the resolution of diet compositional data (feces vs the average of all feces per individual) and temporal restrictions for the population (year-round vs within-season). Overall, a tendency for ingredient specialization (PSi 0.37 ± 0.14) and absence of nutrient specialization (PSi 0.79 ± 0.10) was observed. Ingredient specialization was mainly influenced by the proportion of berries, graminoids, oats and moose in the diet. Annual, seasonal and reproductive class effects were moderate and did not strongly affect PSi for both ingredients and nutrients. Organizing diet compositional data from a ‘feces resolution' to ‘individual resolution' decreased specialization. Changing the comparative population in PSi calculations from ‘all-year-round' to ‘within year and season' also resulted in less pronounced specialization. The degree of specialization was not caused by individuals exhibiting consistent ingredient preferences over the years (low repeatability of PSi) except in spring. Our results suggested absence of nutrient specialization and mild ingredient specialization, which appeared to be an outcome of the ecological circumstances rather than specific individual traits. Additionally, we demonstrated that the methods applied can have substantial influence for the calculation of specialization indices. brown bear, dietary specialization, nutrienten_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectbrown bearen_US
dc.subjectdietary specializationen_US
dc.subjectnutrienten_US
dc.titleDo ingredient and nutrient intake reveal individual dietary specialization in an omnivorous carnivore, the brown bear?en_US
dc.title.alternativeDo ingredient and nutrient intake reveal individual dietary specialization in an omnivorous carnivore, the brown bear?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.source.journalWildlife Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wlb3.01305
dc.identifier.cristin2278968
dc.relation.projectAndre: Special Research Fund(BOF) of Ghent Universityen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere01305en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal