Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaridnirun, Ghan
dc.contributor.authorSukumal, Niti
dc.contributor.authorGrainger, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorSavini, Tommaso
dc.coverage.spatialNorthern Thailanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T07:29:16Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T07:29:16Z
dc.date.created2023-04-28T11:44:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Ecology and Conservation. 2023, 44 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2351-9894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3135190
dc.description.abstractWildlife in Southeast Asia is greatly affected by agricultural expansion. While intensive farming causes biodiversity decline, low-intensive farming can support some adapted wildlife. In Thailand, the rapid transformation of forests to agricultural landscapes over three decades has resulted in large forest and biodiversity loss, with several Endangered species suffering from cropland expansion. Among these, the Green Peafowl, an Endangered Galliformes widely distributed across Southeast Asia, has shown the capacity to adapt well to low-intensive agri culture landscapes by using crops as food sources. Here we investigated in detail the Green Peafowl’s habitat use in an agricultural landscape surrounding a large forest patch composed of three protected areas in northern Thailand. Using line transect surveys and compositional anal ysis, we estimated the monthly Peafowl use of different crop types and different crop structures between January 2020 and January 2021. The Green Peafowl’s habitat use was significantly non random. The order of habitat preference was timber plantations > orchards > cropland > fallow land. The species also preferred cropland within a 500 m buffer zone around the forest patch. The species preferred crops with a canopy structure (timber and orchards) that resembles their natural habitat. Our results confirm that low-intensive and diversified agricultural landscapes could help to sustain the Green Peafowl population. Importantly, we also show that closed canopy crops, such as large tree plantations like teak, rubber and orchards, can provide good alternatives for reforestation to reconnect forest fragments and isolated patches in highly degraded habitats as they allow the species to move further away from forest edges within the degraded landscape.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectLow-intensity agricultureen_US
dc.subjectCompositional analysisen_US
dc.subjectEndangered speciesen_US
dc.subjectFragmented landscapeen_US
dc.subjectHabitat useen_US
dc.subjectHabitat selectionen_US
dc.titleLow-intensive agricultural landscapes could help to sustain Green Peafowl Pavo muticus inhabiting surrounding forest patches in Northern Thailanden_US
dc.title.alternativeLow-intensive agricultural landscapes could help to sustain Green Peafowl Pavo muticus inhabiting surrounding forest patches in Northern Thailanden_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume44en_US
dc.source.journalGlobal Ecology and Conservationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02487
dc.identifier.cristin2144165
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Thailanden_US
dc.source.articlenumbere02487en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal