Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarton, David Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorImmerzeel, Bart
dc.contributor.authorBrander, Luke
dc.contributor.authorGrêt-Regamey, Adrienne
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, Jarumi Kato
dc.contributor.authorKretsch, Conor
dc.contributor.authorLe Clech, Solen
dc.contributor.authorRendón, Paula M.
dc.contributor.authorSeguin, Joana
dc.contributor.authorCoyote, Martha V. Arámbula
dc.contributor.authorAlmenar, Javier Babí
dc.contributor.authorBalzan, Mario V.
dc.contributor.authorBurkhard, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorCarvaho-Santos, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorGeneletti, Davide
dc.contributor.authorGoñi, Victoria Guisado
dc.contributor.authorGiannakis, Elias
dc.contributor.authorLiekens, Inge
dc.contributor.authorLupa, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Gillian
dc.contributor.authorStępniewska, Małgorzata K.
dc.contributor.authorTanacs, Eszter
dc.contributor.authorvan ‘t Hoff, Vince
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Franziska E.
dc.contributor.authorZoumides, Christos
dc.contributor.authorZwierzchowska, Iwona
dc.contributor.authorGrammatikopoulou, Ioanna
dc.contributor.authorVillosalda, Miguel
dc.coverage.spatialEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-18T12:27:31Z
dc.date.available2024-06-18T12:27:31Z
dc.date.created2024-06-17T14:36:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2367-8194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3134536
dc.description.abstractAiming at understanding the role of plural values in decision-making, the IPBES Values Assessment defined nature valuation broadly as including biophysical, economic and socio-cultural assessments, including ecosystem service assessment. IPBES reviews of scientific literature revealed a lack of documentation of uptake by stakeholders across method types. The EU project SELINA aims to contribute to increasing uptake of ES assessments at different governance levels. This paper reviews guidance in national and local applications by compiling study design recommendations for ES assessments from 111 guidance documents on ES assessments covering 12 European languages. Guidance documents are evaluated for seven diagnostic topics suggested to increase relevance and robustness of ES assessments: ecosystem condition variables; capacity-potential; supply-demand; spatial scaling and resolution capability; social and health benefit compatibility; economic valuation compatibility; and uncertainty assessment. The paper develops the guidance recommendations across these topics into a set of checklists for practitioners and contractors of ES assessments. We find synergies between these study design features and gaps in guidance in relation to the policy cycle. Checklists are aimed at projects self-assessing and improving their design and implementation to increase robustness of their ES assessment. From a knowledge supply perspective, this is expected to increase the likelihood of uptake of results by stakeholders. We end the paper with some cautions on limitations to uptake from different perspectives and the demand for and political uses of ES assessment knowledge. ecosystem condition, social benefits, health benefits, economic valuation, ecosystem accounting, spatial scale, spatial resolution, ecosystem capacity, ecosystem potential, uncertaintyen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectecosystem conditionen_US
dc.subjectsocial benefitsen_US
dc.subjectspatial scaleen_US
dc.subjectspatial resolutionen_US
dc.subjectecosystem capacityen_US
dc.subjectecosystem potentialen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.titleIncreasing uptake of ecosystem service assessments: best practice check-lists for practitioners in Europeen_US
dc.title.alternativeIncreasing uptake of ecosystem service assessments: best practice check-lists for practitioners in Europeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 212en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalOne Ecosystemen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/oneeco.9.e120449
dc.identifier.cristin2276756
dc.relation.projectEU – Horisont Europa (EC/HEU): SELINA: 101060415en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP)en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/CUPen_US
dc.relation.projectEU/National Biodiversity Future Centre (NBFC)en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/H43C22000530001en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/CN00000033en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere120449en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal