Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKopatz, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Anita J.
dc.contributor.authorSpong, Göran
dc.contributor.authorValtonen, Mia
dc.contributor.authorKojola, Ilpo
dc.contributor.authorAspi, Jouni
dc.contributor.authorKindberg, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorFlagstad, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorKleven, Oddmund
dc.coverage.spatialNorway, Sweden, Finlanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T08:44:45Z
dc.date.available2024-05-31T08:44:45Z
dc.date.created2024-05-13T09:28:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1612-4642
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132080
dc.description.abstractHarmonising methodology between countries is crucial in transborder population monitoring. However, immediate application of alleged, established DNA-based methods across the extended area can entail drawbacks and may lead to biases. Therefore, genetic methods need to be tested across the whole area before being deployed. Around 4,500 brown bears (Ursus arctos) live in Norway, Sweden, and Finland and they are divided into the western (Scandinavian) and eastern (Karelian) population. Both populations have recovered and are connected via asymmetric migration. DNA-based population monitoring in Norway and Sweden uses the same set of genetic markers. With Finland aiming to implement monitoring, we tested the available SNP-panel developed to assess brown bears in Norway and Sweden, on tissue samples from a representative set of 93 legally harvested individuals from Finland. The aim was to test for ascertainment bias and evaluate its suitability for DNA-based transnational-monitoring covering all three countries. We compared results to the performance of microsatellite genotypes of the same individuals in Finland and against SNP-genotypes from individuals sampled in Sweden (N = 95) and Norway (N = 27). In Finland, a higher resolution for individual identification was obtained for SNPs (PI = 1.18E-27) compared to microsatellites (PI = 4.2E-11). Compared to Norway and Sweden, probability of identity of the SNP-panel was slightly higher and expected heterozygosity lower in Finland indicating ascertainment bias. Yet, our evaluation show that the available SNP-panel outperforms the microsatellite panel currently applied in Norway and Sweden. The SNP-panel represents a powerful tool that could aid improving transnational DNA-based monitoring of brown bears across these three countries. DNA-based transborder monitoring · Genetic methods · Microsatellites · Noninvasive sampling · Singlenucleotide polymorphism · Wildlife managementen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectDNA-based transborder monitoringen_US
dc.subjectGenetic methodsen_US
dc.subjectMicrosatellitesen_US
dc.subjectNoninvasive samplingen_US
dc.subjectSinglenucleotide polymorphismen_US
dc.subjectWildlife managementen_US
dc.titleExpanding the spatial scale in DNA-based monitoring schemes: ascertainment bias in transnational assessmentsen_US
dc.title.alternativeExpanding the spatial scale in DNA-based monitoring schemes: ascertainment bias in transnational assessmentsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.source.volume70en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Wildlife Researchen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10344-024-01808-0
dc.identifier.cristin2267849
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: Norwegian institute for nature research (NINA)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber53en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal