Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHayes, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorAlp, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBoavida, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorBatalla, Ramon J.
dc.contributor.authorBejarano, Maria Dolores
dc.contributor.authorNoack, Markus
dc.contributor.authorVanzo, Davide
dc.contributor.authorCasas-Mulet, Roser
dc.contributor.authorVericat, Damia
dc.contributor.authorCarolli, Mauro
dc.contributor.authorTonolla, Diego
dc.contributor.authorHalleraker, Jo Halvard
dc.contributor.authorGosselin, Marie-Pierre
dc.contributor.authorChiogna, Gabriele
dc.contributor.authorZolezzi, Guido
dc.contributor.authorVenus, Terese E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T10:58:07Z
dc.date.available2023-09-22T10:58:07Z
dc.date.created2023-09-20T14:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091331
dc.description.abstractAs the share of renewable energy grows worldwide, flexible energy production from peak-operating hydropower and the phenomenon of hydropeaking have received increasing attention. In this study, we collected open research questions from 220 experts in river science, practice, and policy across the globe using an online survey available in six languages related to hydropeaking. We used a systematic method of determining expert consensus (Delphi method) to identify 100 high-priority questions related to the following thematic fields: (a) hydrology, (b) physico-chemical properties of water, (c) river morphology and sediment dynamics, (d) ecology and biology, (e) socio-economic topics, (f) energy markets, (g) policy and regulation, and (h) management and mitigation measures. The consensus list of high-priority questions shall inform and guide researchers in focusing their efforts to foster a better science-policy interface, thereby improving the sustainability of peak-operating hydropower in a variety of settings. We find that there is already a strong understanding of the ecological impact of hydropeaking and efficient mitigation techniques to support sustainable hydropower. Yet, a disconnect remains in its policy and management implementation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectRenewable energiesen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.subjectFlow rampingen_US
dc.subjectLoad followingen_US
dc.subjectWater resources managementen_US
dc.subjectScience-policy interfaceen_US
dc.subjectFundingen_US
dc.subjectApplied scienceen_US
dc.subjectDelphi methoden_US
dc.subjectHorizon scanen_US
dc.title100 key questions to guide hydropeaking researchen_US
dc.title.alternative100 key questions to guide hydropeaking researchen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.volume187en_US
dc.source.journalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2023.113729
dc.identifier.cristin2177193
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/101022905en_US
dc.source.articlenumber113729en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal