Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorŘíha, Milan
dc.contributor.authorRabaneda-Bueno, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorJarić, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Allan T.
dc.contributor.authorVejřík, Lukáš
dc.contributor.authorDraštík, Vladislav
dc.contributor.authorBlabolil, Petr
dc.contributor.authorHolubová, Michaela
dc.contributor.authorJůza, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorGjelland, Karl Øystein
dc.contributor.authorRychtecký, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorSajdlová, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorKočvara, Luboš
dc.contributor.authorTušer, Michal
dc.contributor.authorPrchalová, Marie
dc.contributor.authorSeďa, Jaromír
dc.contributor.authorPeterka, Jiří
dc.coverage.spatialTsjekkiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-28T08:31:23Z
dc.date.available2023-02-28T08:31:23Z
dc.date.created2022-08-17T17:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHydrobiologia. 2022, 849 (15), 3351-3371.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3054510
dc.description.abstractTo understand the spatiotemporal overlap in the habitat use of sympatric predators, we studied longitudinal activity and reservoir section and depth use of pike (Esox lucius), pikeperch (Sander lucioerca) and catfsh (Silurus glanis) in the Římov Reservoir, using an autonomous telemetry system for 11 months. We found signifcant diferences among these species in studied parameters that varied considerably over tracked period. Pike consistently used the same sections of the reservoir, while pikeperch and catfsh frequently visited a tributary during the warm season (late spring and early autumn), and moved closer to the dam during the cold season (late autumn to early spring). Pike longitudinal activity was highest in the cold season, pikeperch in the warm season, and catfsh activity peaked in both seasons. Overlap in the depth use among species was higher in the warm season, when all species used the upper layer of the water column, and lower in the cold season, when pikeperch and catfsh used deeper areas. These results demonstrated overlay and temporal variation of habitat use among these predators, as well as potential spatiotemporal space for their direct ecological interactions. Acoustic telemetry · Predators · Habitat use · Movement ecology · Winter ecologyen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectAcoustic telemetryen_US
dc.subjectPredatorsen_US
dc.subjectHabitat useen_US
dc.subjectMovement ecologyen_US
dc.subjectWinter ecologyen_US
dc.titleSeasonal habitat use of three predatory fishes in a freshwater ecosystemen_US
dc.title.alternativeSeasonal habitat use of three predatory fishes in a freshwater ecosystemen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.source.pagenumber3351-3371en_US
dc.source.volume849en_US
dc.source.journalHydrobiologiaen_US
dc.source.issue15en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10750-022-04938-1
dc.identifier.cristin2043950
dc.relation.projectAndre: ERDF/ESF: Biomanipulation as a tool for improving water quaen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: QK1920011: Methodology of predatory fsh quantifcation in..en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal