Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paloma Marques
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Katia M.P.M. de Barros
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton Cezar
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Bernardo Brandão Niebuhr
dc.contributor.authorVancine, Maurício Humberto
dc.contributor.authorChiarello, Adriano Garcia
dc.contributor.authorPaglia, Adriano Pereira
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T15:45:56Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T15:45:56Z
dc.date.created2022-10-01T01:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Mammalogy. 2022, 103 (6), 1385-1396.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3054395
dc.description.abstractClimate change and habitat loss have been identified as the main causes of species extinction. Forest regeneration and protected areas are essential to buffer climate change impacts and to ensure quality habitats for threatened species. We assessed the current and future environmental suitability for the maned sloth, Bradypus torquatus, under both future climate and forest restoration scenarios, using ecological niche modeling. We compared environmental suitability for two Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUnorth and ESUsouth) using two climate change scenarios for 2070, and three potential forest regeneration scenarios. Likewise, we evaluated the protection degree of the suitable areas resulting from the models, according to Brazilian law: PA—Protected Areas; PPA—Permanent Protection Areas (environmentally sensitive areas in private properties); and LR—Legal Reserves (natural vegetation areas in private properties). Finally, we calculated the deficit of PPA and LR in each ESU, considering the current forest cover. Forest regeneration might mitigate the deleterious effects of climate change by maintaining and increasing environmental suitability in future scenarios. The ESUnorth contains more suitable areas (21,570 km²) than the ESUsouth (12,386 km²), with an increase in all future scenarios (up to 45,648 km² of new suitable areas), while ESUsouth might have a significant decrease (up to 7,546 km² less). Suitable areas are mostly unprotected (ESUnorth—65.5% and ESUsouth—58.3%). Therefore, PPA and PA can maintain only a small portion of current and future suitable areas. Both ESUs present a high deficit of PPA and LR, highlighting the necessity to act in the recovery of these areas to accomplish a large-scale restoration, mitigate climate change effects, and achieve, at least, a minimum forested area to safeguard the species. Notwithstanding, a long-term conservation of B. torquatus will benefit from forest regeneration besides those minimum requirements, allied to the protection of forest areas. Atlantic Forest, climate change, conservation, forest regeneration, landscape ecology, Pilosa, Xenarthraen_US
dc.description.abstractNatural forest regeneration on anthropogenic landscapes could overcome climate change effects on the endangered maned sloth (Bradypus torquatus, Illiger 1811)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectAtlantic Foresten_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjectforest regenerationen_US
dc.subjectlandscape ecologyen_US
dc.subjectPilosaen_US
dc.subjectXenarthraen_US
dc.titleNatural forest regeneration on anthropized landscapes could overcome climate change effects on the endangered maned sloth (Bradypus torquatus, Illiger 1811)en_US
dc.title.alternativeNatural forest regeneration on anthropogenic landscapes could overcome climate change effects on the endangered maned sloth (Bradypus torquatus, Illiger 1811)en_US
dc.title.alternativeNatural forest regeneration on anthropized landscapes could overcome climate change effects on the endangered maned sloth (Bradypus torquatus, Illiger 1811)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1385-1396en_US
dc.source.volume103en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Mammalogyen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jmammal/gyac084
dc.identifier.cristin2057329
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 287925en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel