Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBarton, David Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T09:38:30Z
dc.date.available2022-11-23T09:38:30Z
dc.date.created2022-11-14T10:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2367-8194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3033564
dc.description.abstractThe paper argues that monetary valuation of ecosystem services for ecosystem accounting needs to be sensitive to institutional context, when simulating markets to generate exchange values where none was available previously and when conducting value generalisation that extrapolates exchange values from specific sites to the whole acounting area. The same ecosystem type can contain different governance regimes or, conversely, a single governance regime may be present in many ecosystem types. Governance regimes are, in part, determined by ecosystem type and condition, but also by ecosystem access characteristics which vary over urban-rural gradients. An ecosystem service will not have a single price if costs of supply and transaction vary in space. This is generally true for all accounting compatible valuation methods if they are extrapolated across different market contexts, but require particular attention if markets are simulated for specific locations and then assumed to be generally valid for the accounting area. The paper exemplifies this for different institutional settings for exchange values of recreation services exploring the general recommendation in SEEA EA for making valuation methods sensitive to institutional context. Stated preference methods simulate markets for ecosystem services. The paper then reviews non-market stated preference valuation studies that have been sensitive to institutional design. Findings on institutional design are, therefore, specifically relevant for simulation of market exchange values for the purpose of compiling monetary ecosystem accounts. The paper finds that disregard for the institutional context in valuation for ecosystem accounting can lead to: (i) errors of generalisation/aggregation and (ii) downward ‘bias’ in simulated accounting prices (relative to the status quo of the institutional context). simulated exchange value (SEV), recreation services, System of Environmental and Economic Accounts Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EA), value transfer, value generalisation, stated preference, non-market valuation, monetary accountsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectsimulated exchange value (SEV)en_US
dc.subjectrecreation servicesen_US
dc.subjectSystem of Environmental and Economic Accounts Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EA)en_US
dc.subjectvalue transferen_US
dc.subjectvalue generalisationen_US
dc.subjectstated preferenceen_US
dc.subjectnon-market valuationen_US
dc.subjectonetary accountsen_US
dc.titleRecognising institutional context in simulating and generalising exchange values for monetary ecosystem accountsen_US
dc.title.alternativeRecognising institutional context in simulating and generalising exchange values for monetary ecosystem accountsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authoren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 212en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.journalOne Ecosystemen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/oneeco.7.e85283
dc.identifier.cristin2073254
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/817527en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere85283en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal