Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Provisioning and Cultural Ecosystem Services in Estuaries
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3001546Utgivelsesdato
2022Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NINA [2411]
- Scientific publications [1437]
Originalversjon
10.3390/su14127252Sammendrag
It is widely argued that humans deteriorate and vandalize ecosystems, yet little is known about the advantages they receive from the same. The study employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach to identify studies on the value of ecosystems, with a focus on estuaries between the years 2000 to 2021. The review included a total of 61 studies, which highlighted: (a) the importance of estuarine ecosystem services; (b) the stress placed on estuaries as a result of human activity; and (c) the importance of ecosystem services to human well-being. These studies aid in our understanding of the provisioning and cultural services that ecosystems provide to humans, as well as how the ecosystem services assist individuals in diversifying their livelihoods. Our systematic review revealed that: (a) estuaries provide benefits to humans and are used for survival, (b) cultural ecosystem services are important and valuable; however, (c) as a result of human activities and climate change, ecosystem services face numerous threats such as pollution, overexploitation of resources, and poor water quality, among others. Future research should focus on how estuary users perceive the ecosystem services that estuaries provide, and there should be more publications and studies on the benefits that estuaries provide. The systematic review highlighted that most studies are outdated, there are few to no new studies on ecosystem services and estuaries, and those that are available do not directly address the importance of estuaries. provisioning ecosystem services; estuaries; cultural ecosystem services; fishing
Tidsskrift
SustainabilityOpphavsrett
© 2022 The AuthorsBeslektede innførsler
Viser innførsler beslektet ved tittel, forfatter og emneord.
-
National mapping and assessment of ecosystem services projects in Europe – Participants’ experiences, state of the art and lessons learned
Vári, Ágnes; Adamescu, Cristian Mihai; Balzan, Mario; Gocheva, Kremena; Götzl, Martin; Grunewald, Karsten; Inácio, Miguel; Linder, Madli; Obiang-Ndong, Gregory; Pereira, Paulo; Santos-Martín, Fernando; Sieber, Ina; Stepniewska, Malgorzata; Tanacs, Eszter; Termansen, Mette; Tromeur, Eric; Vackarova, Davina; Czúcz, Bálint (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2024)Backed by the Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 and 2030, numerous ‘Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services’ (MAES) projects have been completed in recent years in the member states of the European Union, with substantial ... -
Kartlegging og verdsetting av bytrærs betydning for økosystemtjenester i Bodø, Bærum, Kristiansand og Oslo. Trekroner-prosjektet
Barton, David N.; A'Campo, Willeke; Immerzeel, Bart; Östberg, Johan; Often, Anders (NINA Rapport;2391, Research report, 2024)Barton, D.N., A'Campo, W.A.J., Immerzeel, B., Östberg, J. & Often, A. 2024. Kartlegging og verdisetting av bytrærs betydning for økosystemtjenester i Bodø, Bærum, Kristiansand og Oslo. NINA Rapport 2391. Norsk institutt ... -
Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective
Vallecillo, Sara; Polce, Chiara; Barbosa, Ana; Castillo, Carolina Perpiña; Vandecasteele, Ine; Rusch, Graciela; Maes, Joachim (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2018)Target 2 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 aims at the deployment of Green Infrastructure (GI) and the restoration of at least 15% of degraded ecosystems. We assess different alternatives for the spatial planning of ...