Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorHowson, Pete
dc.contributor.authorGrainger, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Yit Arn
dc.contributor.authorPfeifer, Marion
dc.description.abstractBackground: The scale of land degradation worldwide has led the UN to declare the Decade of Ecosystem Restoration and movements such as the Bonn Challenge (https:// www. bonnc halle nge. org/), have placed ecological restoration on the global policy agenda. Achieving such ambitious policy targets and restoration goals will necessitate complex trade-offs against limited time, competing knowledge, costs, resources, and varying societal preferences among different stakeholders. Participatory scenarios are a tool to navigate uncertainties surrounding future trajectories and simultaneously incorporate different stakeholder perspectives. They can provide a path to identify collaborative solutions best suited for the local cultures and societies they are tied to. However, there is no systematic understanding of how participatory scenarios are being used in ecological restoration planning to navigate trade-offs in restoration outcomes. We will fill this research gap by mapping the existing evidence from participatory restoration scenarios to answer the primary research question ‘How are outcomes explored in participatory ecological restoration scenarios?’. This will be done through five sub-questions focussing on characteristics of the evidence base, types of study design, how outcomes and trade-offs in those are explored, and an examination of the role of participants in the scenario process and outcome determination. Methods: This protocol outlines the methods for a systematic map to identify studies that have used participatory scenarios in restoration planning. A comprehensive and reproducible search strategy will be undertaken across bibliographic databases, web-based engines, and targeted searches in organisational online libraries. Searches will be done online in English, but results in all languages will be screened. Search results will go through a two-step screening process of against pre-determined criteria of inclusion and exclusion, for title and abstract and then full-text. Data will be extracted from eligible studies using a standardised data extraction spreadsheet where details on study characteristics, design and outcomes will be recorded. A searchable database of studies and mapping outcomes will be available upon completion of the work. The aim is to inform how scenarios can be better used as a decision-making tool to increase stakeholder participation and account for trade-offs in restoration outcomes across social, ecological, and economic dimensions. Evidence synthesis, Alternative futures, Place-based research, Socioecological systems, Trade-offs, Co-production, Stakeholder engagementen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.subjectEvidence synthesisen_US
dc.subjectAlternative futuresen_US
dc.subjectPlace-based researchen_US
dc.subjectSocioecological systemsen_US
dc.subjectStakeholder engagementen_US
dc.titleThe role of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map protocolen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe role of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map protocolen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Evidenceen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: NERC program (NE/S007512/1)en_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: BBSRC Global Challenges Research Funden_US
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: Norwegian institute for nature research (NINA)en_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: British Academyen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal