Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Christopher M.
dc.contributor.authorCebrian-Piqueras, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Erik
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Riley
dc.contributor.authorSchnell, Alberto Arroyo
dc.contributor.authorRomanelli, Barbara Battioni
dc.contributor.authorFilyushkina, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGoodson, Devin J.
dc.contributor.authorHorcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Dana N.
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Rose
dc.contributor.authorKuiper, Jan J.
dc.contributor.authorLo, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Rodrıguez, Marıa D.
dc.contributor.authorMarch, Hug
dc.contributor.authorMetzger, Marc
dc.contributor.authorOteros-Rozas, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorSalcido, Evan
dc.contributor.authorSellberg, My
dc.contributor.authorStewart, William
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Mallén, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorPlieninger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorvan Riper, Carena J.
dc.contributor.authorVerburg, Peter H.
dc.contributor.authorWiedermann, Magdalena M.
dc.identifier.citationOne Earth. 2022, 5 (3), 252-264.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a ‘‘relational turn’’ in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although ‘‘inclusivity’’ is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleInclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospectsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Basale biofag: 470en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Basic biosciences: 470en_US
dc.source.journalOne Earthen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: National Science Foundation (1854767)en_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: Federal Ministry of Education and Research Germanyen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: Belmont Forum and BiodivERsAen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMASen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: University of Illinois Campus Research Boarden_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spainen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Researchen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal