Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPhumanee, Worrapan
dc.contributor.authorSteinmetz, Robert
dc.contributor.authorPhoonjampa, Rungnapa
dc.contributor.authorBejraburnin, Thawatchai
dc.contributor.authorGrainger, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorSavini, Tomaso
dc.coverage.spatialThailand, South-East Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T11:26:43Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T11:26:43Z
dc.date.created2020-09-28T17:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2682779
dc.description.abstractLongitudinal studies of wildlife are urgently needed in South-East Asia to understand population responses to the high poaching pressure that characterizes this region. We monitored population trends and habitat use of five heavily poached ungulate species (gaur, sambar, wild pig, red muntjac, and Fea’s muntjac) over five years in two protected areas in western Thailand using camera trap surveys. We used single-season occupancy models to investigate effects of ecological and anthropological variables on ungulate distribution, and multi-season models to assess occupancy dynamics over time. Occupancy of gaur and sambar was low (<0.25), but concentrated near saltlicks and at low elevations. Wild pig and muntjac occupancies were 3–4 times higher (0.60–0.80). Wild pig occupancy was lower near villages, but this effect dissipated in the final year of the study, coinciding with a purported decrease in poaching. Wild pig occupancy increased significantly, with the probability of colonizing new sites doubling from 0.40 to 0.81 over time. In contrast, occupancy rates of gaur, sambar, and muntjac did not grow, though they were stable. Poaching pressure during the study was low, perhaps allowing populations to stabilize. But only wild pig (the most resilient of the five species) increased. The failure of gaur and sambar to recover might stem from historical overhunting combined with ecological constraints, particularly low saltlick density. Recovery of ungulates (and the carnivores that depend on them) in overhunted South-East Asian reserves might require intensive interventions, particularly habitat improvement and population augmentation, to achieve conservation objectives. habitat management; multi-season occupancy; population trend; prey augmentation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecthabitat managementen_US
dc.subjectmulti-season occupancyen_US
dc.subjectpopulation trenden_US
dc.subjectprey augmentationen_US
dc.titleOccupancy-based monitoring of ungulate prey species in Thailand indicates population stability, but limited recoveryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authors.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalEcosphereen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.cristin1834492
dc.relation.projectAndre: WWF-United Statesen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: WWF- Germanyen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: WWF-Swedenen_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburien_US
dc.relation.projectAndre: B. Grimmen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal