Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeneletti, Davide
dc.contributor.authorEsmail, Blal Adem
dc.contributor.authorCortinovis, Chiara
dc.contributor.authorArany, Ildikó
dc.contributor.authorBalzan, Mario
dc.contributor.authorvan Beukering, Pieter J. H.
dc.contributor.authorBicking, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Paulo AV
dc.contributor.authorBorisova, Bilyana
dc.contributor.authorGil, Artur
dc.contributor.authorInghe, Ola
dc.contributor.authorKopperoinen, Leena
dc.contributor.authorKruse, Marion
dc.contributor.authorLiekens, Inge
dc.contributor.authorLowicki, Damian
dc.contributor.authorMizgajski, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorMulder, Sara
dc.contributor.authorNedkov, Stoyan
dc.contributor.authorOstergard, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorPicanço, Ana
dc.contributor.authorRuskule, Anda
dc.contributor.authorSantos-Martín, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSieber, Ina M.
dc.contributor.authorSvensson, Johan
dc.contributor.authorVačkářů, Dava
dc.contributor.authorVeidemane, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorBroekx, Steven
dc.contributor.authorBurkhard, Benjamin
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed. biodiversity, EU Biodiversity Strategy, comparative analysis, ecosystem services, MAES, case studiesen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.subjectEU Biodiversity Strategyen_US
dc.subjectcomparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectcase studiesen_US
dc.titleEcosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studiesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© Geneletti D et al.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.source.journalOne Ecosystemen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal