Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPeay, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Stein Ivar
dc.contributor.authorBean, Colin W.
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Alison M.
dc.contributor.authorSandodden, Roar
dc.contributor.authorEdsman, Lennart
dc.coverage.spatialEurope, Norway, Swedennb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T12:58:47Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T12:58:47Z
dc.date.created2019-02-28T14:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1424-2818
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2603943
dc.description.abstractSignal crayfish, as an invasive alien species in Europe, have caused impacts on aquatic communities and losses of native crayfish. Eradication of recently established populations may be possible in small ponds (<2.5 ha) and short lengths of small watercourses using a nonselective biocide. Between 2004 and 2012, a total of 13 sites in the U.K. were assessed for suitability. Six were treated with natural pyrethrum and crayfish were successfully eradicated from three. In Norway, five sites were assessed and two sites were treated with a synthetic pyrethroid, cypermethrin, both successfully. In Sweden, three sites were treated with another synthetic pyrethroid, deltamethrin, all successfully. Defining the likely extent of population was critical in determining the feasibility of treatment, as well as the ability to treat the whole population effectively. Important constraints on projects included site size, habitat complexity, environmental risks, cooperation of landowners and funding availability. Successful projects were manageably small, had good project leadership, had cooperation from stakeholders, had access to resources and were carried out within one to three years. Factors influencing success included treating beyond the likely maximum geographical extent of the population and taking care to dose the treated area thoroughly (open water, plus the banks, margins, inflows and outflows). Recommendations are given on assessing the feasibility of biocide treatments and project-planning. crayfish; alien species; biological invasion; control; biocide; eradication; signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus; natural pyrethrum; synthetic pyrethroid; toxicitynb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBiocide Treatment of Invasive Signal Crayfish: Successes, Failures and Lessons Learnednb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2019 by the authorsnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480nb_NO
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalDiversitynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/d11030029
dc.identifier.cristin1681471
dc.relation.projectAndre: Norwegian Food Safety Authoritynb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: County Governor of Oslo and Akershusnb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: County Governor of Telemarknb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: Miljødirektoratetnb_NO
cristin.unitcode7511,5,0,0
cristin.unitnameLillehammer
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal