Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBredin, Yennie Katarina
dc.contributor.authorLindhjem, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorvan Dijk, Jiska Joanneke
dc.contributor.authorLinnell, John Durrus
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T11:42:17Z
dc.date.available2018-01-05T11:42:17Z
dc.date.created2015-08-05T09:14:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEcological Economics. 2015, 118 198-206.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2476003
dc.description.abstractFor many deep-rooted resource conflicts where the cultural component of ecosystem services (ES) is strong, standard monetary valuation may be methodologically difficult and not always meaningful. A deeper understanding of the value plurality of key stakeholders may be called for to develop acceptable policies. We use the Q method to analyse the perceived and actual trade-offs related to Norwegian wildlife management, a source of prominent conflict in Norway. We identify and classify distinct arguments in thewildlife management debate following the ES framework, and use the Q method to explore extant/prominent narratives characterising stakeholders' perceptions of the importance of arguments about biodiversity and ES. Finally, we reflect on whether and to what extent the Q method can contribute to our understanding of resource conflicts, underlying values, and ES trade-offs. Three clear narratives appeared: Pro-sheep grazing (cultural), pro-carnivore conservation (intrinsic) and a middle position emphasising recreational hunting (utilitarian). Despite considerable disagreement among narratives, the Q analysis also revealed areas of common ground useful for developing acceptable policies. Given the inherent complexity of socio-ecological systems, it is useful to draw from a diverse toolbox of methods, including the Q method for ES analysis. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Q method Values Carnivores Conservation Ecosystem servicesnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: A Q analysisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Økonomi: 210nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 210nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber198-206nb_NO
dc.source.volume118nb_NO
dc.source.journalEcological Economicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.005
dc.identifier.cristin1256429
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 212919nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEU/FP7-ENV-2011-282743).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7511,5,0,0
cristin.unitcode7511,6,0,0
cristin.unitcode7511,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameLillehammer
cristin.unitnameOslo
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for terrestrisk økologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal