dc.contributor.author | Bredin, Yennie Katarina | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindhjem, Henrik | |
dc.contributor.author | van Dijk, Jiska Joanneke | |
dc.contributor.author | Linnell, John Durrus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-05T11:42:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-05T11:42:17Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-08-05T09:14:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Economics. 2015, 118 198-206. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2476003 | |
dc.description.abstract | For many deep-rooted resource conflicts where the cultural component of ecosystem services (ES) is strong, standard monetary valuation may be methodologically difficult and not always meaningful. A deeper understanding of the value plurality of key stakeholders may be called for to develop acceptable policies. We use the Q method to analyse the perceived and actual trade-offs related to Norwegian wildlife management, a source of prominent conflict in Norway. We identify and classify distinct arguments in thewildlife management debate following the ES framework, and use the Q method to explore extant/prominent narratives characterising stakeholders' perceptions of the importance of arguments about biodiversity and ES. Finally, we reflect on whether and to what extent the Q method can contribute to our understanding of resource conflicts, underlying values, and ES trade-offs. Three clear narratives appeared: Pro-sheep grazing (cultural), pro-carnivore conservation (intrinsic) and a middle position emphasising recreational hunting (utilitarian). Despite considerable disagreement among narratives, the Q analysis also revealed areas of common ground useful for developing acceptable policies. Given the inherent complexity of socio-ecological systems, it is useful to draw from a diverse toolbox of methods, including the Q method for ES analysis. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Q method Values Carnivores Conservation Ecosystem services | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Mapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: A Q analysis | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Økonomi: 210 | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Economics: 210 | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 198-206 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 118 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Ecological Economics | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.005 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1256429 | |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 212919 | nb_NO |
dc.relation.project | EU/FP7-ENV-2011-282743). | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 7511,5,0,0 | |
cristin.unitcode | 7511,6,0,0 | |
cristin.unitcode | 7511,2,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Lillehammer | |
cristin.unitname | Oslo | |
cristin.unitname | Avdeling for terrestrisk økologi | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |