Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDick, Jan
dc.contributor.authorTurkelboom, Francis
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Helen
dc.contributor.authorIniesta-Arandia, Irene
dc.contributor.authorPrimmer, Eeva
dc.contributor.authorSaarela, Sanna-Riikka
dc.contributor.authorBezak, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMederly, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLeone, Michael
dc.contributor.authorVerheyden, Wim
dc.contributor.authorKelemen, Eszter
dc.contributor.authorHauck, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Chris
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Paula
dc.contributor.authorAszalós, Réka
dc.contributor.authorBaró, Francesc
dc.contributor.authorBarton, David Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Pam
dc.contributor.authorBugter, Rob
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorCzúcz, Balint
dc.contributor.authorDunford, Rob
dc.contributor.authorBlancos, Gemma Garcia
dc.contributor.authorGeamănăt, Nicoleta
dc.contributor.authorGiucăt, Relu
dc.contributor.authorGrizzetti, Bruna
dc.contributor.authorIzakovičováv, Zita
dc.contributor.authorKertész, Miklós l
dc.contributor.authorKopperoinen, Leena
dc.contributor.authorLangemeyer, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorLapola, David Montenegro
dc.contributor.authorLiquete, Camino
dc.contributor.authorLuque, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorPastur, Guillermo Martinéz
dc.contributor.authorMartín-López, Berta
dc.contributor.authorMukhopadhyay, Raktima
dc.contributor.authorNiemela, Jari
dc.contributor.authorOdee, David
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorPinho, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorBlumentrath, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorFongar, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Baggethun, Erik
dc.contributor.authorGundersen, Vegard
dc.contributor.authorHaavardsholm, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Berit
dc.contributor.authorLindhjem, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorNowell, Megan Sara
dc.contributor.authorOften, Anders
dc.contributor.authorReinvang, Rasmus
dc.contributor.authorRusch, Graciela
dc.contributor.authorStange, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T12:19:20Z
dc.date.available2017-12-07T12:19:20Z
dc.date.created2017-12-06T11:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2212-0416
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2469551
dc.description.abstractThe ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners’ perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning. 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectStakeholder perceptionsnb_NO
dc.subjectPlace-based implementationnb_NO
dc.subjectplace-based implementationnb_NO
dc.subjectevaluationnb_NO
dc.subjectEcosystem services operationalisationnb_NO
dc.titleStakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: results from 27 case studiesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210nb_NO
dc.source.journalEcosystem Servicesnb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1523437
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/OpenNESS (Grant agreement no. 308428)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7511,6,0,0
cristin.unitcode7511,5,0,0
cristin.unitcode7511,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameOslo
cristin.unitnameLillehammer
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for terrestrisk økologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal