dc.contributor.author | Miller, Jennie | |
dc.contributor.author | Linnell, John Durrus | |
dc.contributor.author | Athreya, Vidya | |
dc.contributor.author | Sen, Subharanjan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-17T14:08:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-17T14:08:47Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-11-15T09:47:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Economic and Political Weekly. 2017, L11 (45), 23-25. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0012-9976 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2467010 | |
dc.description.abstract | Approaches for resolving incidences of human–wildlife conflict such as predator attacks on people or livestock typically use methods that address physical loss but ignore social, cultural, and emotional trauma. To holistically and more permanently alleviate conflicts, wildlife management agencies and other conservation practitioners require resources and training in outreach and public relations, and need to expand their toolkit of approaches in order to connect with varied stakeholders in a greater diversity of settings. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.title | Human–wildlife conflict in India. Addressing the source | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Samfunnsgeografi: 290 | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Human geography: 290 | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 23-25 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | L11 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Economic and Political Weekly | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 45 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1514254 | |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 251112 | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 7511,2,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Avdeling for terrestrisk økologi | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |