The Network of Knowledge approach: improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe
Nesshöver, Carsten; Vandewalle, Marie; Wittmer, Heidi; Balian, Estelle V; Carmen, Esther; Geijzendorffer, Ilse R; Görg, Christoph; Jongman, Rob; Livoreil, Barbara; Santamaria, Luis; Schindler, Stefan; Settele, Josef; Sousa Pinto, Isabel; Török, Katalin; Watt, Allan D; Young, Juliette C; Zulka, Klaus Peter; The Kneu Project Team, *
Journal article, Peer reviewed
View/ Open
Date
2016Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NINA [2398]
- Scientific publications [1424]
Abstract
The absence of a good interface between scientific and other knowledge holders
and decision-makers in the area of biodiversity and ecosystem services has been recognised
for a long time. Despite recent advancements, e.g. with the IntergovernmentalPlatform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), challenges remain, particularly
concerning the timely provision of consolidated views from different knowledge domains.
To address this challenge, a strong and flexible networking approach is needed across
knowledge domains and institutions. Here, we report on a broad consultation process
across Europe to develop a Network of Knowledge on biodiversity and ecosystem services
(NoK), an approach aiming at (1) organising institutions and knowledge holders in an
adaptable and responsive framework and (2) informing decision-makers with timely and
accurate biodiversity knowledge. The consultation provided a critical analysis of the needs
that should be addressed by a NoK and how it could complement existing European
initiatives and institutions at the interface between policy and science. Among other
functions, the NoK provides consolidated scientific views on contested topics, identification
of research gaps to support relevant policies, and horizon scanning activities to
anticipate emerging issues. The NoK includes a capacity building component on interfacing
activities and contains mechanisms to ensure its credibility, relevance and legitimacy.
Such a network would need to ensure credibility, relevance and legitimacy of its
work by maximizing transparency and flexibility of processes, quality of outputs, the link
to data and knowledge provision, the motivation of experts for getting involved and sound
communication and capacity building.