Modelling heterogeneity in the classification process in multi-species distribution models can improve predictive performance
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version

View/ Open
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NINA [2443]
- Scientific publications [1470]
Abstract
Species distribution models and maps from large-scale biodiversity data are necessary for conservation management. One current issue is that biodiversity data are prone to taxonomic misclassifications. Methods to account for these misclassifications in multi-species distribution models have assumed that the classification probabilities are constant throughout the study. In reality, classification probabilities are likely to vary with several covariates. Failure to account for such heterogeneity can lead to biased prediction of species distributions. Here, we present a general multi-species distribution model that accounts for heterogeneity in the classification process. The proposed model assumes a multinomial generalised linear model for the classification confusion matrix. We compare the performance of the heterogeneous classification model to that of the homogeneous classification model by assessing how well they estimate the parameters in the model and their predictive performance on hold-out samples. We applied the model to gull data from Norway, Denmark and Finland, obtained from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Our simulation study showed that accounting for heterogeneity in the classification process increased the precision of true species' identity predictions by 30% and accuracy and recall by 6%. Since all the models in this study accounted for misclassification of some sort, there was no significant effect of accounting for heterogeneity in the classification process on the inference about the ecological process. Applying the model framework to the gull dataset did not improve the predictive performance between the homogeneous and heterogeneous models (with parametric distributions) due to the smaller misclassified sample sizes. However, when machine learning predictive scores were used as weights to inform the species distribution models about the classification process, the precision increased by 70%. We recommend multiple multinomial regression to be used to model the variation in the classification process when the data contains relatively larger misclassified samples. Machine learning prediction scores should be used when the data contains relatively smaller misclassified samples.
Journal
Ecology and EvolutionCopyright
© 2024 The AuthorsRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Vandringsløsninger for fisk i regulerte vassdrag – oppsummering av resultater fra forskningsprosjektet SafePass
Forseth, Torbjørn; Museth, Jon (NINA Rapport;1861, Research report, 2020)Forseth, T. & Museth, J. 2020. Vandringsløsninger for fisk i regulerte vassdrag – oppsummering av resultater fra forskningsprosjektet SafePass. NINA Rapport 1861. Norsk institutt for naturforskning. I denne rapporten ... -
Slitasje og egnethet for stier brukt til sykling. En feltstudie og en GIS-modell
Evju, Marianne; Hedger, Richard; Nowell, Megan; Vistad, Odd Inge; Hagen, Dagmar; Jokerud, Mari; Olsen, Siri Lie; Selvaag, Sofie K.; Wold, Line C. (NINA Rapport;1880, Research report, 2020)Evju, M., Hedger, R., Nowell, M., Vistad, O.I., Hagen, D., Jokerud, M., Olsen, S.L., Selvaag, S.K. & Wold, L.C. 2020. Slitasje og egnethet for stier brukt til sykling. En feltstudie og en GIS-modell. NINA Rapport 1880. ... -
Dataflyt og modellering av indikatorer for naturindeksen
Skarpaas, Olav; Töpper, Joachim P.; Nilsen, Erlend B.; Åström, Jens (NINA Rapport;1560, Research report, 2018)Skarpaas, O., Töpper, J.P., Nilsen, E.B., Åström, J. 2018. Dataflyt og modellering av indikatorer for naturindeksen. NINA Rapport 1560. Norsk institutt for naturforskning. Som en del av arbeidet mot en kostnadseffektiv, ...