Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEnvall, Ida
dc.contributor.authorBengtsson, Jan
dc.contributor.authorJakobsson, Simon
dc.contributor.authorRundlöf, Maj
dc.contributor.authorÅberg, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorLindborg, Regina
dc.coverage.spatialSweden, Sverigeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T09:00:39Z
dc.date.available2022-03-25T09:00:39Z
dc.date.created2021-09-24T08:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Evidence. 2021, 10 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-2382
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2987561
dc.description.abstractSensors, such as accelerometers, in tracking devices allow for detailed bio-logging to understand animal behaviour, even in remote places where direct observation is difcult. To study breeding in birds remotely, one needs to understand how to recognise a breeding event from tracking data, and ideally validate this by direct observation. We tagged 49 adult female pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus) with transmitter neckbands in Finland in spring of 2018 and 2019, and in Svalbard in summer 2018, and validated inferences from tracking by feld observations of nesting sites and family status in 2018–2020 (54 spring–summer tracks). We estimated nesting locations by taking the median coordinates of GPS-fxes at which the goose was motionless (overall dynamic body acceleration, ODBA < 1) on days with a daily median ODBA < 1, which approached the real nesting locations closely (within 1.6–3.7 m, n = Background: Semi-natural pastures are unfertilized grasslands with a long history of traditional low-input grazing management. This kind of pastures are recognized for their high species richness. However, as a consequence of modernization of agriculture, many of the semi-natural pastures have been lost during the last century, leading to a serious threat to farmland biodiversity. Semi-natural pastures are relatively low in productivity. Hence, to increase proftability, farmers may want to give the grazing animals access to additional nutrient sources. This can be done either as supplementary feeding, or by fencing the semi-natural pastures into the same enclosure as improved, more nutrient-rich, pastures. These practices are, however, controversial. It is argued that since semi-natural pastures are species-rich partly because they are nutrient-poor, introducing additional nutrients into the system should be avoided. Accordingly, in Sweden, these interventions are often prohibited while receiving fnancial subsidies for management of semi-natural pastures. However, since many farmers are dependent on such support to maintain their pastures, these prohibitions often cause problems. The question has been raised whether giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources really afect the biodiversity in semi-natural pastures, as is assumed. The primary aim of the proposed systematic review is to answer this question. Method: Peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched for using bibliographic databases, search engines, specialist websites and stakeholder contacts. The references will be screened for relevance according to a predefned set of eligibility criteria. The criteria will be tested and clarifed iteratively, until consistency in interpretations is achieved. Thereafter, the literature will be screened in two stages, frst based upon title and abstract and then by examining full texts. Full text screening will be performed with blinded decisions by two independent reviewers. Each relevant study will then be critically appraised, based on a set of predefned validity criteria. A narrative synthesis will be provided, outlining the evidence base in terms of bibliographic information and study metadata. If possible, quantitative syntheses based on meta-analyses will be performed. Identifed relevant knowledge gaps will be highlighted and discussed. Grasslands, Grazing management, Supplementary feeding, Creep feeding, Nutrient relocation, Biological diversity, Species diversity, Functional diversity, Cattle, Livestocken_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectGrasslandsen_US
dc.subjectGrazing managementen_US
dc.subjectSupplementary feedingen_US
dc.subjectCreep feedingen_US
dc.subjectNutrient relocationen_US
dc.subjectBiological diversityen_US
dc.subjectSpecies diversityen_US
dc.subjectFunctional diversityen_US
dc.subjectCattleen_US
dc.subjectLivestocken_US
dc.titleWhat is the effect of giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources on biodiversity in semi-natural pastures? A systematic review protocolen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Basale biofag: 470en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Basic biosciences: 470en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Evidenceen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13750-021-00230-2
dc.identifier.cristin1937956
dc.relation.projectAndre: Formas, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Developmenten_US
dc.source.articlenumber16en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal