Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorPérez Soba, M.
dc.contributor.authorArchaux, F.
dc.contributor.authorBlicharska, M.
dc.contributor.authorEgoh, B.N.
dc.contributor.authorErős, T.
dc.contributor.authorFabrega Domenech, N.
dc.contributor.authorGyörgy, Á. I.
dc.contributor.authorHaines-Young, R.
dc.contributor.authorLi, S.
dc.contributor.authorLommelen, E.
dc.contributor.authorMeiresonne, L.
dc.contributor.authorMiguel Ayala, L.
dc.contributor.authorMononen, L.
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, G.
dc.contributor.authorStange, Erik
dc.contributor.authorTurkelboom, Francis
dc.contributor.authorUiterwijk, M.
dc.contributor.authorVeerkamp, C.J.
dc.contributor.authorWyllie de Echeverria, V.
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T12:13:18Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T12:13:18Z
dc.date.created2017-12-08T09:42:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-29
dc.identifier.issn2212-0416
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2470151
dc.description.abstractThere is no unified evidence base to help decision-makers understand how the multiple components of natural capital interact to deliver ecosystem services. We systematically reviewed 780 papers, recording how natural capital attributes (29 biotic attributes and 11 abiotic factors) affect the delivery of 13 ecosystem services. We develop a simple typology based on the observation that five main attribute groups influence the capacity of natural capital to provide ecosystem services, related to: A) the physical amount of vegetation cover; B) presence of suitable habitat to support species or functional groups that provide a service; C) characteristics of particular species or functional groups; D) physical and biological diversity; and E) abiotic factors that interact with the biotic factors in groups A–D. ‘Bundles’ of services can be identified that are governed by different attribute groups. Management aimed at maximising only one service often has negative impacts on other services and on biological and physical diversity. Sustainable ecosystem management should aim to maintain healthy, diverse and resilient ecosystems that can deliver a wide range of ecosystem services in the long term. This can maximise the synergies and minimise the trade-offs between ecosystem services and is also compatible with the aim of conserving biodiversity. 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBiodiversitynb_NO
dc.subjectFunctional diversitynb_NO
dc.subjectTraitnb_NO
dc.subjectAttributenb_NO
dc.subjectTrade-offsnb_NO
dc.subjectLand managementnb_NO
dc.titleHow natural capital delivers ecosystem services: a typology derived from a systematic reviewnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Økonomi: 210nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 210nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber111-126nb_NO
dc.source.volume26nb_NO
dc.source.journalEcosystem Servicesnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006
dc.identifier.cristin1524531
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/OpenNESS (Grant agreement no. 308428)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7511,5,0,0
cristin.unitnameLillehammer
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal